REV I EWS AND
SYNTHESES Connections between species diversity and genetic
diversity
Mark Vellend1* and
Monica A. Geber2
1National Center for Ecological
Analysis and Synthesis, 735 State
Street, Suite 300, Santa Barbara,
CA 93101, USA
2Department of Ecology and
Evolutionary Biology, Cornell
University, Ithaca, NY 14853,
USA
*Correspondence and present
address: Departments of Botany
and Zoology, and Biodiversity
Research Centre, University of
British Columbia, Vancouver,
BC, Canada V6T 1Z4. E-mail:
mvellend@interchange.ubc.ca
Abstract
Species diversity and genetic diversity remain the nearly exclusive domains of community
ecology and population genetics, respectively, despite repeated recognition in the
literature over the past 30 years of close parallels between these two levels of diversity.
Species diversity within communities and genetic diversity within populations are
hypothesized to co-vary in space or time because of locality characteristics that influence
the two levels of diversity via parallel processes, or because of direct effects of one level
of diversity on the other via several different mechanisms. Here, we draw on a wide
range of studies in ecology and evolution to examine the theoretical underpinnings of
these hypotheses, review relevant empirical literature, and outline an agenda for future
research. The plausibility of species diversity–genetic diversity relationships is supported
by a variety of theoretical and empirical studies, and several recent studies provide direct,
though preliminary support. Focusing on potential connections between species diversity
and genetic diversity complements other approaches to synthesis at the ecology–
evolution interface, and should contribute to conceptual unification of biodiversity
research at the levels of genes and species.
Keywords
Biodiversity, coexistence, community ecology, drift, genetic diversity, migration, neutral
model, population genetics, selection, species diversity.
Ecology Letters (2005) 8: 767–781
I N TRODUCT ION
Individual organisms within a community may represent
different species or different genetic variants within species.
The birth, death and movement of individuals determine the
dynamics of both populations and communities, and
therefore both genetic diversity within populations and
species diversity within the community. Species diversity
and genetic diversity have traditionally received independent
treatment by community ecologists and population genet-
icists, respectively, despite repeated recognition in the
literature over the past 30 years of potential connections
between these two most fundamental levels of biodiversity
(Antonovics 1976, 1992, 2003; Harper 1977; Huston 1994;
Hairston et al. 1996; Amarasekare 2000; Kassen 2002; Chave
2004). The recent emergence of �community genetics�
(Antonovics 1992) as �the study of the interaction between
genes within a species and populations of other species in a
community� (Agrawal 2003) has revived intense interest in
understanding the interplay between ecological and evolu-
tionary processes in determining community structure and
dynamics. Elucidating the different ways in which species
diversity and genetic diversity may be linked promises to
help achieve this goal, and to provide a basis for conceptual
unification in biodiversity research. Here we review the
hitherto loosely associated set of ideas pointing to connec-
tions between species diversity and genetic diversity,
drawing on basic theory in ecology and evolution to provide
a conceptual framework and agenda for research on links
between these two levels of biodiversity.
Species diversity and genetic diversity may be related in
three main ways (Fig. 1); these cases are not mutually
exclusive. If locality characteristics (or any common cause)
influence the two levels of diversity in a parallel manner
(Fig. 1, case I), a positive correlation between them may
result. To the extent that genetic variation determines a
population’s demographic performance and viability, or that
genetic variation in a dominant species determines the biotic
environment experienced by the rest of the community,
species diversity may be causally influenced by genetic
Ecology Letters, (2005) 8: 767–781 doi: 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2005.00775.x
�2005 Blackwell Publishing Ltd/CNRS
diversity within component species (case II). Conversely, if
the species diversity of a community influences the selection
regime experienced by component populations, genetic
diversity may be causally influenced by the diversity and
relative abundances of coexisting species (case III). These
simple depictions belie a tremendous degree of complexity
in the details of how species diversity and genetic diversity
may be related. In this paper, we outline the theoretical
underpinnings of each of the three general hypotheses,
highlighting relevant empirical studies, gaps in our know-
ledge and key observations or experiments needed to fill
these gaps.
A vast literature falls under the general themes of species
and genetic diversity. A narrowing of scope is therefore
needed to restrict attention to the key points of contact
between the two levels of diversity. First, we will consider
only �local� diversity measured in patches of habitat or
experimental plots (�localities�) within a single region. In the
framework presented here, genetic diversity within particular
species must be measured or manipulated in different
localities; when considering diversity patterns at large spatial
scales (e.g. latitudinal gradients), this is not possible even in
theory because variation in species diversity is often
accompanied by complete turnover in species composition
(i.e. none of the species can be sampled in all localities).
Second, at the community level, we only consider diversity
within a single trophic level. Different genotypes of the
same species may interact in much the same way as different
species within a trophic level, but there is no population-
level analogue for multitrophic interactions, except perhaps
in the special case of cannibalism. Additional constraints
that define our domain of application are presented in
subsequent sections. Following Chase & Leibold (2003), we
use the Tilman (1982) resource competition model in several
sections for the purpose of graphical illustration of
theoretical concepts. Our conceptual framework is not
limited to communities in which resource competition
controls dynamics, but this model provides an intuitively
straightforward basis for illustrating selected examples.
DEF IN I T IONS
Species diversity and genetic diversity can be defined,
measured or manipulated in a number of different ways.
Species diversity is most often measured as species richness,
the number of species in a given locality. In studies that
experimentally manipulate species diversity (reviewed by
Loreau et al. 2001), it is also most often species richness that
is varied among treatments. Several indices of species
diversity incorporate information about the relative abun-
dances of species in a locality, with higher diversity indicated
by a more even distribution of abundance among species –
higher �evenness� (Magurran 2004). This paper is concerned
largely with species richness.
When discrete alleles or genotypes can be distinguished in
a population, as in studies employing molecular markers,
measurements of genetic diversity are closely analogous to
those of species diversity. Allelic or genotypic richness is the
number of different alleles or genotypes, respectively, in a
population. The probability that two randomly chosen
alleles or genotypes are different is equivalent to the Hardy–
Weinberg expected heterozygosity when estimated for loci
in the nuclear genome of diploid organisms, and is also
referred to as �gene diversity� for other kinds of genetic
markers (Nei 1987). Gene diversity is identical to the
Simpson index of species diversity (Magurran 2004). With
DNA sequence data, nucleotide diversity (p) is the
equivalent of gene diversity for individual nucleotide
positions rather than loci, and nucleotide polymorphism
(h) is the proportion of nucleotide positions that are
variable, or segregating, in a sample of sequences. For
quantitative traits, genetic diversity is measured as the
genetic variance, or the component of the total phenotypic
variance in a population attributable to genetic differences
Locality
Characteristics
Area
isolation
spatial/temporal
heterogeneity
environment, etc.
Genetic diversity
within populations
Species diversity
within communities
Immig
ration
drift
selec
tion
Immigrationdriftselection
Parallel
effects
(case I)
Causal
effects
Case II
Case III
Figure 1 Potential connections between
species diversity and genetic diversity.
768 M. Vellend and M. A. Geber
�2005 Blackwell Publishing Ltd/CNRS
among individuals (Falconer & Mackay 1996). The relative
magnitude of quantitative genetic variance in large numbers
of populations of the same species is reported far less
frequently than genetic diversity at loci with discretely
recognizable variants (e.g. molecular markers), and is also
quite difficult to manipulate experimentally (we return to the
latter issue later in this paper.) For this reason, our
arguments in this paper pertain largely to genetic diversity
measured using discrete alleles or genotypes, although it is
important to note that the component of quantitative
genetic variance that is inherited additively is directly related
to heterozygosity at the underlying loci (Falconer & Mackay
1996).
Genetic diversity can be measured for traits that are
neutral (often assumed for molecular markers) or traits that
are under selection. This distinction has important implica-
tions for predicting either the effects of different processes
on genetic diversity, or the effects of genetic diversity on
population or community characteristics. These differences
are highlighted in the Theoretical underpinnings section
below.
For natural or experimental populations comprised of
clonal, non-recombining genotypes, as in many populations
of bacteria, zooplankton and clonal or apomictic plants
(at least over short periods of time), the measurement
and manipulation of genetic diversity is exactly analogous
to that of species diversity. For simplicity, our theoretical
illustrations using the resource competition model consider
genetic diversity as the number of clonal genotypes in a
given species. We consider cases in which the interest is
in genetic diversity in one particular focal species, and
also cases in which the interest is in genetic diversity in each
of two or more competing species, although in most
empirical studies genetic diversity is measured in only
one species from the community. In all cases, we are
interested in genetic diversity within populations of parti-
cular species.
THEORET I CAL UNDERP INN INGS
Parallel processes – case I
Theories of species diversity and genetic diversity share
many striking similarities, to the point that individual models
are often described as applying equally well to both (e.g.
Amarasekare 2000; Chase & Leibold 2003). Empirical data
have revealed a predominance of positive relationships
between species diversity and genetic diversity (see section
Empirical research past and future), and here we focus on
potential processes acting in parallel at the two levels that
may create such relationships in the absence of direct causal
effects of one level of diversity on the other.
Genetic diversity is controlled by four processes,
mutation, drift, migration and selection, each of which has
an analogue at the level of species diversity (Table 1).
Speciation creates new species much as mutation creates
new alleles. However, because speciation and mutation
occur on very different time scales and speciation is unlikely
to explain variation in diversity among localities within a
region (but see Losos & Schluter 2000), we restrict our
attention to the remaining three processes, which may create
variation in diversity among localities in very similar ways at
the two levels.
Drift and migration
As a necessary consequence of populations and commu-
nities being comprised of finite numbers of individuals, both
genes and species are prone to random fluctuations in
abundance (i.e. drift), possibly to the point of local
extinction. Immigration may provide new species or novel
alleles at one or more loci that counteract the effects of drift.
Drift and migration influence species and genetic diversity in
fairly similar and straightforward ways (but see section
Caveats). Neutral diversity is regulated almost entirely by the
action of drift and migration (plus mutation and speciation;
Kimura 1983; Hubbell 2001), but these processes can also
have important effects on non-neutral diversity (e.g.
Lenormand 2002; Mouquet et al. 2004; Vellend 2005). The
effects of drift and migration are frequently manifested as
positive correlations of diversity with the area or connec-
tivity of localities (Rosenzweig 1995; Frankham et al. 2002),
and these variable locality characteristics may, in turn, drive
positive correlations between species diversity and genetic
diversity (Vellend 2005).
Selection and environmental heterogeneity
The influence of selective processes on diversity is
considerably more complex than that of neutral processes.
Only non-neutral genetic diversity is relevant here, except to
the extent that selection may alter overall population size,
Table 1 Processes that influence diversity, defined to emphasize the parallels at the levels of genetic diversity and species diversity
Mutation/speciation: the creation of new alleles/species
Drift: random changes in the relative frequencies of alleles/species
Migration: movement among populations/communities of alleles/species
Selection: processes that favour particular alleles/species over others
Species diversity and genetic diversity 769
�2005 Blackwell Publishing Ltd/CNRS
and therefore genetic diversity for neutral traits as well. At
the most basic level, selection favours some individuals over
others and these individuals may represent different species
or different genetic variants within species. There are far too
many selection-based theories of diversity in community
ecology to deal with individually, so to determine which
theories may be relevant to explaining correlated patterns of
species and genetic diversity, it is useful here to highlight the
subtle distinction between models of species coexistence,
and models of diversity patterns in space or time. Studies of
coexistence generally aim to discover processes that prevent
one type dominating all others (Gause 1934). As such,
models of coexistence are often applied to understanding
community dynamics at a single locality, and may or may
not help explain why one place has more diversity than
another. In the context of this review, the only mechanisms
of coexistence that need be considered are those in which
the strength of the underlying process varies among
localities. As will be explained below, for some mechanisms
this is plausible, while for others it is not.
Spatial and temporal heterogeneity in the environment
may create diversifying selection that is thought to be a
powerful mechanism of maintaining both species diversity
and genetic diversity and so may generate correlations
between them. Different species or genotypes can coexist if
species- or genotype-specific fitness varies in space or time
such that each type is favoured over the others in enough
places or at enough times to avoid local extinction in the
long term (Chesson 2000; Barot & Gignoux 2004). The
spatial or temporal environmental heterogeneity can be of
two general types. Exogenous heterogeneity includes spatial
or temporal variation in factors such as soil characteristics or
climate. Such heterogeneity is ubiquitous in nature (Bell et al.
1993), and because localities may vary in the magnitude of
internal heterogeneity, they may also differ in diversity (e.g.
Tews et al. 2004). Endogenous heterogeneity arises from the
activities of organisms themselves. For example, if some
species or genotypes have high survival rates in the face of
competition but low colonization rates of newly opened
microsites, or vice versa, coexistence of many species is
possible (Tilman 1994). However, given the same potential
species pool in different localities, it is difficult to imagine
how the strength of such a process could vary among
localities in such a way as to drive patterns of species and
genetic diversity in predictable and parallel ways, even
though colonization–competition tradeoffs may operate
both within (e.g. Solbrig & Simpson 1974) and among
species (Tilman 1994). On the other hand, if spatial or
temporal variability in the identity of neighbours (i.e.
competitors) is considered a source of endogenous
heterogeneity (Huston & DeAngelis 1994), the potential
arises for direct effects of one level of diversity on the other.
This potential is addressed in subsequent sections.
Simultaneous responses of species diversity and genetic diversity
The preceding discussion points to three variable locality
characteristics as strong candidates for having parallel
effects on, and creating correlated patterns in, species
diversity and genetic diversity. Locality area influences
both levels of diversity via drift; isolation via immigration;
and exogenous heterogeneity via spatially or temporally
varying selection. We do not consider variation among
localities in average environmental quality (e.g. producti-
vity and soil moisture) to be a likely driver of parallel
variation in species and genetic diversity. Although average
environmental conditions are often strong predictors of
diversity, the underlying mechanisms are likely to vary
among systems (e.g. Waide et al. 1999), and each species is
likely to respond individualistically to the environment, so
we cannot make any general predictions about parallel
effects on species and genetic diversity. This represents an
important limit to the domain of application of the present
approach.
While the factors that influence species diversity and
genetic diversity in isolation have received thorough
theoretical treatment, relatively little is known about the
simultaneous response of the two levels of diversity to
variable locality characteristics. Figure 2 illustrates one
scenario in which environmental heterogeneity may increase
both species diversity and genetic diversity when species and
genotypes compete for resources. A recent modelling study
of both levels of diversity under a range of scenarios
produced some results that adhere to expectations based on
separate community and population models, while other
results were more surprising (Vellend 2005). In this
individual-based and spatially explicit simulation model of
plant communities, locality area and immigration rate had
universal positive effects on both species diversity and
genetic diversity, regardless of whether or not variants were
neutral with respect to selection (Vellend 2005). Area and
isolation drove positive correlations between species diver-
sity and genetic diversity and the correlations were stronger
when genetic diversity was measured for common vs. rare
species. In these models, spatial environmental heterogen-
eity always had a strong positive effect on species diversity
by allowing coexistence of species with fitness optima at
different positions along an environmental gradient. How-
ever, although genotypes differed within species in much the
same way that species differed within the community, the
effects of environmental
本文档为【物种多样性和遗传多样性的关系】,请使用软件OFFICE或WPS软件打开。作品中的文字与图均可以修改和编辑,
图片更改请在作品中右键图片并更换,文字修改请直接点击文字进行修改,也可以新增和删除文档中的内容。
该文档来自用户分享,如有侵权行为请发邮件ishare@vip.sina.com联系网站客服,我们会及时删除。
[版权声明] 本站所有资料为用户分享产生,若发现您的权利被侵害,请联系客服邮件isharekefu@iask.cn,我们尽快处理。
本作品所展示的图片、画像、字体、音乐的版权可能需版权方额外授权,请谨慎使用。
网站提供的党政主题相关内容(国旗、国徽、党徽..)目的在于配合国家政策宣传,仅限个人学习分享使用,禁止用于任何广告和商用目的。