皇帝轮流做,明年到我家（The emperor took turns to come to my house next year）

皇帝轮流做,明年到我家（The emperor took turns to come to my house next year） 皇帝轮流做,明年到我家(The emperor took turns to come to my house next year) As the saying goes "the emperor turns to do, next to my house. Only teach him to move out. The temple and I will let it; if not, must be upset, not Qingping!" - Wukong From "emperors take turns, next year come to my house" to see democracy consciousness "The emperor takes turns to come to my house next year" is a familiar saying of the Chinese people. Probably people envy expression to the emperor, and at the same time, "military and political leaders of Ning will jointly become the basis of public opinion of the peasant uprising. This sentence was originally written in various characters, probably the "journey to the west", the author borrowed sun monkey's mouth, said: "as the saying goes:" the emperor turns to do next year to my home. "." Just teach him to move out and let the temple go to me." There are many people who criticize this proverb. For example, it exposed the Chinese worship of the emperor, embodies the Chinese emperors' mentality, this mentality is not good, the mentality of people, usually are used to bully, once he became emperor, and would like the former Emperor that oppress the people, this is a completely autocratic thinking. However, there is a sense of democracy, a mixture of autocratic thinking and democratic consciousness, which shows that the Chinese people are still great. What kind of democratic consciousness is this? In fact, human beings as a biological species, inherent equality concept! "Military and political leaders rather a kind of peace is more than two thousand years ago Chen Shengwu were sent against Chinese first generation of imperial autocracy when the cry of a book recorded by the literati, military and political leaders is not what special race, is walking on two legs higher animal only, has expressed equality consciousness, but still with a doubt the tone, with an apparent" reasonable doubt "composition. Then, after repeated "unification, imperialism, violence and separatism", the slang invented by the people, "the emperor turns to me next year to my house", is entirely a contempt for the imperial power. This is a step forward! Not only embodies the equality consciousness, but also reflects the paries master political participation consciousness of equality! However, this sentence sounds like "emperor" is the wild fruit, the fish in the river, who can be an easy job to do in the bag like, but with a kind of helpless ridicule, is Chinese people's sense of humor. In fact, "emperor" is not the fruit of the wilderness, nor is it the fish in the river, it is not so easy to income in the bag. The emperor is also a human being! But once a man has become an emperor, he is no longer a human being. Regardless of how to do the emperor is the emperor, is the deadliest, or "Zhongxingpengyue", is the emperor was given the detached position, he would not have the initiative to give up the throne. So the ancient dynasty ruling by rarely without bloodshed, the emperor abdicated to little after death. Ancient China did not invent a competitive regime, without rival competitors, and that was nothing. Now, however, the times are different. It is time for us to consider how to achieve the ideal of "the emperor takes turns to come to my house next year". How to achieve it? In fact, the complex is also complicated, simple to say is also simple! We don't often say, "nothing in the world is difficult for one who sets his mind on it." I think the important thing is to realize that the emperor is just a legend. The emperor can only have one, and the emperor is not good. It is not for everyone to do, not everyone wants to do it. In fact, "the emperor" is only the embodiment of power and status. What a lot of power in Connaught's China? If the "imperial power" is broken up and subdivided, a lot of "Little Emperors" can be obtained, and everyone turns to be "Little Emperors". Is it possible to have more people? Chinese itself "would rather be beheaded, not a" point of view, I think many people will be willing to do "little emperor". The so-called "little emperor" can be the head of local self-government, and can also be the leader of the field, industry and class autonomy. The key is how to do "take turns", and I think there's no better way to do it than to vote. This is the realization of modern democracy, Let ordinary people have "take turns" opportunities, rather than continue the traditional "hereditary system", to break the "fight father" of the old. The litmus test for distinguishing between democracy and autocracy is election". Elections are democratic, and those who do not elect are arbitrary. Elections are not always good, but choose one that is not bad, and choose the bad ones. An election may pick a bad egg, but not every election chooses a villain, and the villain is chosen to go down and then be hard to get elected again. Only elected representatives can represent themselves. Designated and hereditary representatives can only be represented by us". It is impossible to elect an alien to manage the region. It is impossible to elect a foreigner to administer the country. Elections are like free love. Everyone loves them. "Arranged marriages" are painful. Elections must begin at the grassroots level, because people at the grassroots level are familiar with each other, and the number of people at the grassroots level is very small, and it is easy to have an accepted election result. With the foundation of the election at the grassroots level, it will gradually extend to the upper level until the president of the whole country is elected (the emperor of the new era). As the highest level of the whole nation, the design of the whole country requires great wisdom and great mind. And the choice of democracy this "selfless" system, it needs great character and mature time. Some people say that the Chinese do not like democracy, and the Chinese do not need democracy. This is ridiculous. I think of a story. Once, Grandpa, father and son, three people play together. Father peeled an orange and gave one to his son and gave it to grandpa. The son walked up to his grandfather and said, "Grandpa, you don't want to eat!"!" Grandpa just smiled. The son replied to his father, "grandpa doesn't eat."!" Autocratic vested interests, like the sons of the story, impose their own thoughts on Grandpa, and then embezzle the fruits of grandpa. Perhaps Chinese for thousands of years to express their wishes to develop a "historical love expression" habits, develop a love to protect their existing rights habits, but that does not mean we are not willing to participate in social management. In fact, when it comes to their own interests, in a small circle inside the country, people's participation is still very strong, "wolidou" is the embodiment of the spirit of participation. Some people say that China is too big for democracy. There is a certain reason for this, because the country is big, and there are few people in the whole country who know each other. We all don't know how to carry out the people's election But mankind has long been able to overcome the election of big powers. First of all, a hierarchical election system can greatly reduce the election cycle and get the result of voter recognition. Second, the development of news media and communication technology makes it easy for us to understand each other as long as we are willing. Finally, there are examples of the same big country in the United states. So the power is not suitable for democracy that can stop. Some people say that the national quality is too low, it is not suitable for democracy, otherwise it will be chaotic. This is a broad market argument, but it is untenable. As far as the people are concerned, they are all ordinary people, and they do not have much knowledge of democratic ideas and democracies. However, it is arbitrary to think that the people can not adapt themselves to the Democratic system. This completely underestimated the human ability to adapt, people underestimate the IQ, like people are not stupid, not to know good from bad. In fact, social organizations are family and patriarchal had disintegrated, each family is to manage their own needs, or outsiders to "representative"? Similarly, at the grass-roots level at the village level, people are fully capable of self-government. The natural villages that the Hakka people form in order to avoid wars are proof. Small areas of talent, large areas have large areas of talent, administrative regions at all levels should not worry about finding the right leader. Look at history, how many common people, things in alternating talent shows itself in work opportunities? When it does not arrive, As it has no phase of it? "A hero of the times", a good political system, a suitable game rule, is also a kind of current situation, and can also produce a large number of heroes of the times, and bring up high-quality athletes. Some people say that China's regional differences are too large for democracy. This view is still old thinking. The traditional China, make unified centralized overall, need to balance regional differences, mutual support and mutual aid, combined with the enemy, but with a super state machine to make the country become the same. But the abuses of tyranny do not want to be mentioned here, for this is almost everyone's consensus, and people who are unwilling to give up tyranny do not dare to shout openly. "I am going to be autocratic."!" , but in all kinds of excuses to explain away. Regional disparity is not a problem, and it is because of the great disparity in the region that local autonomy is more important! The "land situation" in different places is different, so that "local autonomy" with distinctive features has been made everywhere! Modern concept of military nationalization, transportation, information and communication technology, tax theory, monetary means, etc., can guarantee the effective governance of the great powers composed of different regions. If the regional difference is not good, does management mean that he is still at the level of modern civilization? Others say that democracy is better than tyranny. This view is specious. As we all know, when marching and fighting, large units can not walk quickly, and social construction is not the case. Engage in tyranny, cannot avoid the same policy of the country, whether it is political, legal, or economic, culture, the same policy deprived place its own policy right, deprived of "feeling" according to local self-government rights! It is doubtful that such a "non seeking truth from facts" approach can be developed efficiently. The root "fast development of mining autocracy", is the official standard thought autocratic system, is the "official people poor" approach is statistical method of subjective bureaucratic ruling class, is the one-sided pursuit of GDP abnormal economic policy! This fast is short, and its prosperity is only an image! No country, democracy and the people's livelihood guarantee, the fast polarization results! It is a complete destruction of social justice! The result speaks for itself. So, please understand the vested interests of the current authoritarian dictatorship, and ask the new institutional leaders of the future to understand that there is no way that democracy can be done in China now. Don't have to eat a fat fantasy, don't begin to dream, do not have a short cut across the development of wishful thinking! Everything begins without maturity. Was China's first monarchy short-lived? However, the later monarchy was becoming more and more perfect. Moreover, the Democratic Republic of China has been tried in the period of the Republic of China. Although it fails, it does not mean that the latter can not succeed. As the saying goes, "one is bad, two are sold, the three is four."." Democracy in the United States has matured, and now it is being sold all over the world. What are we waiting for? Do you want to buy a ready-made one? The trend of the times, by democracy and Datong, because of freedom and prosperity! Time will not wait for me. ah!