Standard Practice
Internal Corrosion Direct Assessment Methodology
for Liquid Petroleum Pipelines
This NACE International standard represents a consensus of those individual members who have
reviewed this document, its scope, and provisions. Its acceptance does not in any respect
preclude anyone, whether he or she has adopted the standard or not, from manufacturing,
marketing, purchasing, or using products, processes, or procedures not in conformance with this
standard. Nothing contained in this NACE International standard is to be construed as granting any
right, by implication or otherwise, to manufacture, sell, or use in connection with any method,
apparatus, or product covered by Letters Patent, or as indemnifying or protecting anyone against
liability for infringement of Letters Patent. This standard represents minimum requirements and
should in no way be interpreted as a restriction on the use of better procedures or materials.
Neither is this standard intended to apply in all cases relating to the subject. Unpredictable
circumstances may negate the usefulness of this standard in specific instances. NACE
International assumes no responsibility for the interpretation or use of this standard by other parties
and accepts responsibility for only those official NACE International interpretations issued by NACE
International in accordance with its governing procedures and policies which preclude the issuance
of interpretations by individual volunteers.
Users of this NACE International standard are responsible for reviewing appropriate health, safety,
environmental, and regulatory documents and for determining their applicability in relation to this
standard prior to its use. This NACE International standard may not necessarily address all potential
health and safety problems or environmental hazards associated with the use of materials,
equipment, and/or operations detailed or referred to within this standard. Users of this NACE
International standard are also responsible for establishing appropriate health, safety, and
environmental protection practices, in consultation with appropriate regulatory authorities if necessary,
to achieve compliance with any existing applicable regulatory requirements prior to the use of this
standard.
CAUTIONARY NOTICE: NACE International standards are subject to periodic review, and may be
revised or withdrawn at any time in accordance with NACE technical committee procedures. NACE
International requires that action be taken to reaffirm, revise, or withdraw this standard no later than
five years from the date of initial publication and subsequently from the date of each reaffirmation or
revision. The user is cautioned to obtain the latest edition. Purchasers of NACE International
standards may receive current information on all standards and other NACE International publications
by contacting the NACE International First Service Department, 1440 South Creek Dr., Houston,
Texas 77084-4906 (telephone +1 281-228-6200).
Approved 2008-11-07
NACE International
1440 South Creek Dr.
Houston, Texas 77084-4906
+1 281-228-6200
ISBN 1-57590-221-4
© 2008, NACE International
NACE SP0208-2008
Item No. 21127
SP0208-2008
NACE
____________________________________________________________________
Foreword
This standard practice formalizes a methodology termed liquid petroleum internal corrosion
direct assessment (LP-ICDA) that can be used to help ensure pipeline integrity. The
methodology is applicable to pipelines that are normally fully packed with petroleum
compound(s) existing in an incompressible liquid state under normal pipeline operating
conditions, with basic (or bottom) sediment and water (BS&W) contamination normally
lower than 5% by volume. This standard is intended for use by pipeline operators and
others who manage pipeline integrity.
The basis of LP-ICDA is identification and detailed examination of locations along a
pipeline in which water or solids can accumulate for extended periods, allowing informed
conclusions to be made about the integrity of the nonexamined pipeline. If the locations
determined to have the highest susceptibility for long-term internally corrosive conditions
are examined and found to be free of significant corrosion, other less susceptible locations
may be considered to be free of corrosion. This standard is not applicable to pipelines in
which corrosion or leaks have occurred at unpredictable locations, and it may not present
an economical alternative to in-line inspection for pipelines found to have moderate or
higher rates of internal corrosion.
LP-ICDA methodology for liquid petroleum systems is described in terms of a four-step
process: (1) pre-assessment, (2) indirect inspection, (3) detailed examination, and (4) post
assessment. The LP-ICDA method provides the greatest benefit for pipelines that cannot
be in-line inspected; however, the method is not limited to unpiggable pipelines.
This standard was prepared by Task Group (TG) 315 on Pipelines (Liquid Petroleum):
Internal Corrosion—Direct Assessment. TG 315 is administered by Specific Technology
Group (STG) 35 on Pipelines, Tanks, and Well Casings. This standard is issued by NACE
International under the auspices of STG 35.
In NACE standards, the terms shall, must, should, and may are used in accordance with the
definitions of these terms in the NACE Publications Style Manual. The terms shall and must
are used to state a requirement, and are considered mandatory. The term should is used to
state something good and is recommended, but is not considered mandatory. The term may
is used to state something considered optional.
_____________________________________________________________________
International i
SP0208-2008
ii
______________________________________________________________________________
NACE International
Standard Practice
Internal Corrosion Direct Assessment Methodology
for Liquid Petroleum Pipelines
Contents
1. General ........................................................................................................................... 1
2. Definitions ....................................................................................................................... 8
3. Pre-Assessment ............................................................................................................. 9
4. Indirect Inspection ......................................................................................................... 11
5. Detailed Examinations .................................................................................................. 16
6. Post Assessment .......................................................................................................... 18
7. LP-ICDA Records ......................................................................................................... 18
References ........................................................................................................................ 19
Appendix A: Determination of Water Accumulation (Nonmandatory) .............................. 22
Appendix B: Determination of Wettability (Nonmandatory) .............................................. 28
Appendix C: Determination of Solids Accumulation (Nonmandatory) .............................. 28
Appendix D: Corrosion Rate Models (Nonmandatory) ..................................................... 31
FIGURES
Figure 1: Pre-Assessment Step .......................................................................................... 3
Figure 2: Indirect Inspection Step ....................................................................................... 4
Figure 3: Detailed Examination—Site Selection ................................................................. 5
Figure 4: Detailed Examination Step .................................................................................. 6
Figure 5: Post-Assessment Step ........................................................................................ 7
Figure A1: Schematic representation of the stratified oil-water flow ................................ 25
Figure C1: Schematic presentation of three-layer model and forces acting on a
representative particle at the interface between the two bed layers ........................... 29
TABLES
Table 1: Typical Data for Use of LP-ICDA Methodology .................................................. 10
________________________________________________________________________
NACE International
SP0208-2008
NACE International
_______________________
1.1.1 This standard is intended to serve as a guide for
or (3) professionals (i.e., engineers or
) with professional experience, including
itigation of internal corrosion and evaluation
of internal corrosion on pipelines.
rk, NY
(2)ASME International (ASME), Three Park Ave., New York, N
(3)American Petroleum Institute (API), 1220 L St. NW, Washin
(4)
British Standards Institute (BSI), 389 Chiswick High Rd., Lo
(5)
Det Norske Veritas (DnV), Veritasveien 1, 1322, Høvik, Os
Y 10016-5990.
gton, DC 2000-4070.
applying the NACE LP-ICDA process to liquid
petroleum pipeline systems.
1.1.2 The primary purposes of the LP-ICDA method
are (1) to enhance the assessment of internal corrosion
in liquid petroleum pipelines, and (2) to improve
pipeline integrity.
1.1.3 The LP-ICDA methodology assesses the
likelihood of internal corrosion and includes existing
methods of examination available to a pipeline operator
to determine whether internal corrosion is actually
present or may occur. This methodology may be
incorporated into corrosion integrity and risk
management plans.
1.1.4 LP-ICDA uses flow modeling results and
provides a framework to utilize those methods.
1.1.5 LP-ICDA was developed for pipelines that are
normally fully packed with petroleum compound(s) that
exists in an incompressible liquid state under normal
pipeline operating conditions, with BS&W
contaminations that are normally less than 5% by
volume.
1.1.6 One benefit of the LP-ICDA approach is that an
assessment can be performed on a pipe segment for
which alternative methods (e.g., in-line inspection [ILI],
hydrostatic testing, etc.) may not be practical.
1.1.7 LP-ICDA has limitations, and not all pipelines
can be successfully assessed with LP-ICDA. These
limitations are identified in the pre-assessment step.
1.1.8 The provisions of this standard shall be applied
by or under the direction of competent persons who, by
reason of knowledge of the physical sciences and the
principles of engineering and mathematics, acquired by
education or related practical experience, are qualified
to engage in the practice of corrosion control and risk
assessment on pipeline systems. Such persons may
be (1) registered professional engineers, (2) re-
cognized as corrosion specialists by organizations such
__________________________________________
(1)American National Standards Institute (ANSI), 11 W. 42nd St., New Yo
ndon, United Kin
lo, Norway.
1.1.9 For accurate and correct application of this
standard, it shall be used in its entirety. Using or
referring to only specific paragraphs or sections can
lead to misinterpretation or misapplication of the
recommendations and practices contained herein.
1.1.10 This standard does not designate practices for
every specific situation because of the complexity of
internal conditions that may be present in various
pipeline systems.
1.1.11 In the process of applying LP-ICDA, other
pipeline integrity threats, such as external corrosion,
mechanical damage, stress corrosion cracking (SCC),
etc., may be detected. When such threats are
detected, additional assessments, inspections, or both
must be performed. The pipeline operator should
utilize appropriate methods to address risks other than
internal corrosion, such as those described in NACE
standards (e.g., SP0204),1 ANSI(1)/ASME(2) B31.4,2
ANSI/ASME B31.8,3 API(3) 1160,4 ANSI/API 579,5 and
BSI(4) 7910,6 international standards (e.g., DnV(5) RP-
F101),7 and other documents.
1.1.12 This standard does not address specific
remedial actions that may be taken when corrosion is
found; however, the reader is referred to ASME B31.42
and other relevant documents (e.g., API 2200)8 for
guidance.
1.2 Four-Step Process
1.2.1 LP-ICDA requires the integration of data from
multiple field examinations and pipe surface
evaluations, including the pipeline’s physical
characteristics and operating history.
1.2.2 LP-ICDA includes the following four steps, as
shown in Figures 1 through 5.
10036.
_____________________________________________________
Section 1: General
1.1 Introduction
as NACE,
technicians
detection/m
1
gdom W4 4AL.
SP0208-2008
2
1.2.2.1 Pre-Assessment. The pre-assessment
step collects essential historic and present
operating data about the pipeline, determines
whether LP-ICDA is feasible, and then defines LP-
ICDA regions. The types of data to be collected
are typically available in design and construction
records, operating and maintenance histories,
alignment sheets, corrosion survey records, liquid
analysis reports, and inspection reports from prior
integrity evaluations or maintenance actions.
1.2.2.2 Indirect Inspection. The indirect inspection
step covers flow predictions, developing a pipeline
elevation profile, and identifying sites along a
pipeline segment most likely to have corrosion
damage caused by water, solids accumulation, or
both, and other factors affecting corrosion
distribution within a LP-ICDA region.
1.2.2.3 Detailed Examination. The detailed
examination step includes performing excavations
and conducting detailed examinations of the pipe
to determine whether metal loss from internal
corrosion has occurred.
1.2.2.4 Post Assessment. The post-assessment
step is an analysis of the data collected from the
three previous steps to assess the effectiveness of
the LP-ICDA process, to develop conclusions
about the integrity of nonexamined pipe, and to
determine reassessment intervals.
NACE International
SP0208-2008
Figure 1
Pre-Assessment Step
Numbers refer to paragraph numbers in this standard.
St
ep
1
:
Pr
e-
As
se
ss
m
en
t
Yes
NACE International 3
SP0208-2008
Figure 2
Indirect Inspection Step
Numbers refer to paragraph numbers in this standard.
From Step 1:
Pre-Assessment
For each LP-ICDA region
4 NACE International
SP0208-2008
Figure 3
Detailed Examination—Site Selection
—
NACE International 5
Numbers refer to paragraph numbers in this standard.
SP0208-2008
Figure 4
Detailed Examination Step
Select dig sites
(go to Step 3a: Figure 3)
6 NACE International
Numbers refer for paragraph numbers in this standard.
SP0208-2008
Figure 5
Post-Assessment Step
Numbers refer to paragraph numbers in this standard.
-
NACE International 7
SP0208-2008
8
_
Hydrostatic Testing: The testing of sections of a
performed by filling the pipeline with water and pre
vertical change in pipe direction that results
pipeline
Overbend: Any
___________________________________
Section
Anomalies: See Indication.
Cleaning Pig: A device inserted in a pipeline for the
purpose of dislodging and removing accumulated
corrodents such as solids or water.
Corrosion: The deterioration of a material, usually a metal,
that results from a reaction with its environment.
Creaming: The separation of the phases of an emulsion
due to deformation of the dispersed droplets and migration
to pipe walls in vertical and near-vertical flows.
Critical Droplet Size (dcrit): The largest size of water
droplet that can be maintained as a water-in-oil dispersion in
horizontal or near-horizontal flow without settling due to
gravitational forces causing stratified oil/water flow.
Critical Inclination Angle: An angle determined by LP-
ICDA flow modeling; the lowest angle at which water
accumulation or solids accumulation is expected to occur.
Critical Velocity (Vcrit): The velocity of a water-in-oil
dispersion in which the maximum water droplet size (dmax) is
smaller than the dcrit. Flow velocity greater than Vcrit
significantly reduces the possibility of water accumulation by
preventing the separation of oil and water into distinct
phases.
Dry Gas Internal Corrosion Direct Assessment (DG-
ICDA): A four-step direct assessment (DA) process to
evaluate the impact of corrosion occurring on the inside wall
of a pipe normally carrying dry natural gas, but may suffer
from infrequent upsets of water.
Direct Assessment (DA): A structured process that
combines pre-assessment, indirect inspections, direct
examination, and post assessment to evaluate the impact of
predictable pipeline integrity threats such as corrosion.
Detailed Examination: The examination of the pipe wall at
a specific location to determine whether metal loss from
internal corrosion has occurred. This may be performed
using any industry-accepted technology, such as visual,
ultrasonic, radiographic means, etc.
Electrolyte: A chemical substance containing ions that
migrate in an electric field.
External Corrosion Direct Assessment (ECDA): A four-
step DA process to evaluate the impact of corrosion
occurring on the outside wall of a pipe on the integrity of a
pipeline.
ssurizing
__________________________________
2: Definitions
it until the nominal hoop stresses in the pipeline reach a
specified value.
Inclination Angle: An angle resulting from a change in
elevation between two points on a pipeline, in degrees.
Indication: Any measured deviation from the norm.
Indirect Inspection: The use of tools, methods, or
procedures to evaluate a pipeline indirectly. For LP-ICDA,
this consists of calculating and comparing flow modeling
results and probability of corrosion distribution with an
inclination profile.
In-Line Inspection (ILI): The inspection of a pipeline from
the interior of the pipe using an ILI tool. The tools used to
conduct ILI are known as pigs, smart pigs, or intelligent
pigs.
In Situ Water Velocity: The average velocity of the bottom
layer of water in stratified oil-water flow.
Liquid: A substance that tends to maintain a fixed volume,
but not a fixed shape.
Liquid Petroleum: Petroleum compound(s) that exists as
an incompressible fluid at every point in the pipeline system
of interest.
Liquid Petroleum Internal Corrosion Direct Assessment
(LP-ICDA): The internal corrosion direct assessment
process as defined in this standard applicable to liquid
petroleum systems.
Low Point: A location having higher elevations immediately
adjacent upstream and downstream.
LP-ICDA Region: A continuous length of pipe (including
weld joints) exhibiting a uniform set of operating parameters
including the following as a minimum: (1) fluid
characteristics (e.g., liquid petroleum, including
contaminants), (2) flow characteristics (e.g., diameter and
flow rate), and (3) mitigative activities (e.g., pigging and
chemical treatment).
Maximum Droplet Size (dmax): The largest size of water
droplet that can be sustained by a flow in a water-in-oil
dispersion without further breakup due to turbulent forces.
Microbiologically Influenced Corrosion (MIC): Corrosion
processes that
本文档为【NACE SP0208-2008Internal Corrosion Direct Assessment Methodology for Liquid Petroleum Pipelines】,请使用软件OFFICE或WPS软件打开。作品中的文字与图均可以修改和编辑,
图片更改请在作品中右键图片并更换,文字修改请直接点击文字进行修改,也可以新增和删除文档中的内容。
该文档来自用户分享,如有侵权行为请发邮件ishare@vip.sina.com联系网站客服,我们会及时删除。
[版权声明] 本站所有资料为用户分享产生,若发现您的权利被侵害,请联系客服邮件isharekefu@iask.cn,我们尽快处理。
本作品所展示的图片、画像、字体、音乐的版权可能需版权方额外授权,请谨慎使用。
网站提供的党政主题相关内容(国旗、国徽、党徽..)目的在于配合国家政策宣传,仅限个人学习分享使用,禁止用于任何广告和商用目的。