雅各布作文评分量表

雅各布作文评分量 表 关于同志近三年现实表现材料材料类招标技术评分表图表与交易pdf视力表打印pdf用图表说话 pdf (Jacobs et al. 1981) Descriptors Score Level Criteria ● Knowledgeable ● Substantive ● Thorough development of thesis ● Relevant to assigned topic CONTENT 30-27 Excellent to very good: knowledgeable * substantive * thorough development of thesis * relevant to assigned topic 26-22 Good to average: some knowledge of subject * adequate range * limited development of thesis * mostly relevant to topic, but lacks detail 21-17 Fair to poor: limited knowledge of subject * little substance * inadequate development of topic 16-13 Very poor: does not show knowledge of subject * non-substantive * not pertinent * OR not enough to evaluate ● Fluent expression ● Ideas clearly stated/ supported ● Succinct ● Well-organized ● Logical sequencing ● Cohesive ORGANIZATION 20-18 Excellent to very good: fluent expression * ideas clearly stated/supported * succinct * well-organized * logical sequencing * cohesive 17-14 Good to average: somewhat choppy * loosely organized but main ideas stand out * limited support * logical but incomplete sequencing 13-10 Fair to poor: nonfluent * ideas confused or disconnected * lacks logical sequencing and development 9-7 Very poor: does not communicate * no organization * OR not enough to evaluate ● Sophisticated range ● Effective word/idiom choice and usage ● Word form mastery ● Appropriate register VOCABULARY 20-18 Excellent to very good: sophisticated range * effective word/idiom choice and usage * word form mastery * appropriate register 17-14 Good to average: adequate range * occasional errors of word/idiom form, choice, usage but meaning not obscured 13-10 Fair to poor: limited range * frequent errors of word/idiom form, choice, usage * meaning confused or obscured 9-7 Very poor: essentially translation * little knowledge of English vocabulary, idioms, word form * OR not enough to evaluate ● Effective complex constructions ● Agreement ● Tense ● Number ● Word order / function USE 25-22 Excellent to very good: effective complex constructions * few errors of agreement, tense, number, word order /function, articles, pronouns, prepositions 21-18 Good to average: effective but simple constructions * minor problems in complex constructions * several errors of agreement, tense, number, word order /function, articles, pronouns, prepositions but meaning seldom obscured LANGUAGE 17-11 Fair to poor: major problems in simple/complex constructions * frequent errors of negation, agreement, tense, number, word order/function, articles, pronouns, prepositions and/or fragments, run-ons, deletions * meaning confused or obscured 10-5 Very poor: virtually no mastery of sentence construction rules * dominated by errors * does not communicate * OR not enough to evaluate ● Spelling ● Punctuation ● Capitalization ● Paragraphing ● Handwriting MECHANICS 5 Excellent to very good: demonstrates mastery of conventions * few errors of spelling, punctuation, capitalization, paragraphing 4 Good to average: occasional errors of spelling, punctuation, capitalization, paragraphing but meaning not obscured 3 Fair to poor: frequent errors of spelling, punctuation, capitalization, paragraphing * poor handwriting * meaning confused or obscured 2 Very poor: no mastery of conventions * dominated by errors of spelling, punctuation, capitalization, paragraphing * handwriting illegible * OR not enough to evaluate         Total scores: 34-52: very poor 52-68: poor to fair 68-83: average to good 83-100: very good to excellent