[外语学习]teofl作文

[外语学习]teofl作文 综合写作 模板 个人简介word模板免费下载关于员工迟到处罚通告模板康奈尔office模板下载康奈尔 笔记本 模板 下载软件方案模板免费下载 The speaker refutes the reading’s argument that(阅读大观点). To overthrow the reading’s assumptions, the speaker offers some dramatically different information. Firstly, the speaker denies the statement in the reading material by pointing out (听力的第一 个观点,此处有时候可以将听力的大观点融合进来). In the speaker’s opinion, 听力的第一个观点的细 节，以主谓宾的形式展开. Yet the reading material only focuses on---, like (尽量用名词搞定). Secondly, the speaker casts doubt on the view in the reading material that (阅读的第二个观点). The reading material believes(阅读第二个观点细节). By contrast, the speaker thinks this less likely/ impossible/ unreasonable. From the opinion of the speaker, (听力第二个观点细节). Thirdly, the speaker belives that(听力的最后一个观点), because---. Yet, the reading material maintains that (阅读的最后一个观点). Obviously, these two views contridict. 例子 Reading material 命题:且病人对药物了解越多越好。 1， 病人可以更多了解处方药的相关信息 (prescription) Objective and comprehensive) 2， 医生开药时，病人可以与广告进行比较， 有利于选药 (self-selecting medication) 3， 通过广告， 病人可以了解到新药的发展，提醒医生(remind the doctors of the new medicines/ to use the new medicines) Listen material 挑战命题:病人不需要对药物了解太多，因为有时候了解太多会对非专业的病人产生困扰(too much knowledge leads bothering, confusion)，且广告所提供的信息也不全面 1， 广告通常只宣传好处(focus on the good effects， 对副作用一笔带过(ignore side effects)，病 人很难判断 2， 病人对药物的准确用法，用量不了解(dose,quantity)，可能会用错 3， 广告只宣传新药，对旧药没有宣传， 但是针对不同的病情，也许旧药更为合适(appropriate) The speaker refutes the reading’s argument that the information in the drug advertisment is both objective and comprehensive. To overthrow the reading’s assumptions, the speaker offers some dramatically different evidences. Firstly, the speaker denies the statement in the reading material by pointing out too much knowledge of the drugs leads to confusion. In the speaker’s opinion, the information in the ads focuses on the good effects and ignores the side effects. Yet the reading material only insists that patients should know as much information as possible. Secondly, the speaker casts doubt on the view in the reading material that the patient can do the self-selecting medication. By contrast, the speaker thinks this less likely/ impossible/ unreasonable. From the opinion of the speaker, the patient is not professional and can make mistakes. Thirdly, the speaker believes that the drug ads forget about old medicine, which is more effective to deal with some diseases. Yet, the reading material maintains that the patient, armed with the knowledge from the drug ads, can advise the doctor to use new drugs. Obviously, these two views contradict. (2010 0522) Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Working at home using computers or telephones is better than working in the office. in this technological age. An increasing number of people choose to complete their work from home and communicate with their offices using computers or telephones. Thus , there are some people who believe that working at home is a better option for workers and their employers . as a result ,such a extreme view is at the center of storm of abuse . I either disagree with such a terrible view. my reasons are as follows. Firstly, telecommuting blurs the line between your leisure time and your work. For most people who work in the office, they have fixed office hours, for example from 9am until 5pm. Anytime outside of that period, except for some rare occasions when they have to work overtime, is considered free time or family time. However, when people start to work from home, they may feel unable to escape their work or separate their life at home from their work. They may start to check their work email first thing in the morning, or they may work late into the night. And because getting to work is so easy without having to commute to the office, they may actually be working longer hours than their office counterparts. Secondly, the quality of work may suffer because of the reduced face-to-face interaction with other employees or supervisors. An important element in the successful operation of a company is effective communication between co-workers. This communication is not simply making a few telephone calls or sending a few emails. It involves face-to-face discussions, brainstorming, or even arguments where innovative ideas and strategic decisions are created. This kind of work atmosphere can never be created in a home environment Finally, once people start working away from the office, there is a decreased sense of working for an institution but instead an increased sense of working for a task or a product. Therefore, workers may feel less loyal to a company and more inclined to change jobs or work part-time or on contract, as long as it can provide reasonable pay and a flexible work schedule. Working in the office, on the other hand, often gives people a sense of belonging, a feeling that they are part of a larger group . Based on the above analysis, I should reiterate that. Working at home is actually not as efficient and rewarding as working in the office. (431) 机经第二篇(2010.1.30): Do you agree that the government should support the scientific research even there’s no practical use? Should government support scientific research that does not have any practical use? There are some people believe that government should pay more attention on those useful researches to deal with real problems. As a result such a extreme view is at the center of storm of abuse . I either don?t agree with such a terrible view. My reasons are as follows. Firstly, basic research which always seems to have no practical use is important for science development. Most of practical science is based on theories. If scientists study nothing about theories, no inventions will be made. For example, Thomas Edison invented electric bulb which enlighten the dark world. He couldn?t make the big breakthrough without discoveries found or basic research by numerous scientists before him. Just like building a house, the height of the building depends on how deep the foundation is. Although basic researches are mostly useless for practice, they are the foundation of science. Secondly, some scientific researches seem to be useless at the beginning while they turn out to be useful in the end. Even scientists couldn?t tell if some researches have practical use. For instance, The research on birds, give the idea to scientists who invent the plane; the research on fish, gives the inspiration to scientists how to invent the submarine. Researching on the boiling water, we have the trains now. So We couldn?t determine which one has practical use and which one doesn?t before we do research. Last but not least, governments should balance the money they have. That the government should support useless scientific research doesn?t mean that the government should pay endless money on it. After all, those researches which can solve real problems are more emergency and crucial to many people. We can see the yield in the close future. Basic research, on the other hand, needs longer time and more energy to show the value. Based on the above analysis, I should reiterate that government should support the scientific research even there?s no practical use 机经第三篇(2010.2.13) Do you agree with the following statement? In a team, those who do not accept others? criticism can not succeed. there is no way one can avoid criticism from other people. Criticism is very natural as most people can see the world from other people?s point of view. Thus , there should be people who believe that the one who cannot accept criticism couldn?t be successful. I strongly agree the idea for the following reasons. firstly, in your everyday life, you can not be sure that your opinions, decisions or approaches are always correct, and in many cases you will need to accept criticism from other members who will point out your mistakes and direct you towards the right course of action. for example, in sports especially in team sports such as football or basketball, any one player, no matter how skillful or experienced this player is, will make mistakes during a game, sometimes even “deadly ones”. And when criticisms pour in after the game, from team members, the coach, or team fans, the best strategy is not to run away or find excuses to avoid these criticisms, but to listen to and accept their criticisms, take their advice, and try hard to improve the next time. Secondly, you may occasionally be misjudged, and therefore unfairly criticized, but in a friendly work environment, these criticisms are often made out of good will. So in these cases it may be helpful that you listen carefully to what others say and try to understand their points of view, instead of reacting aggressively towards them, which may harm team relationship in the long run. I think we all have seen, in real life or on a TV program, a situation where two people started yelling at each other only because one thinks the other is only intentionally finding fault. But often this is due to a simple misunderstanding or miscommunication. A successful team player would first of all stay calm, summarize the other person?s perspective, then find out the root of such misunderstanding, and finally resolve the conflict. Based on the above analysis, I should reiterate that accept criticize is important for person who want to succeed. 机经第四篇(2010.3.6): Challenging plans or practical plans? Plans play an increasingly significant part in people?s life. People, especially those successful persons consider that plans help people more efficient. There are some people believe that one should choose more practical plan rather than challenging one because it is safer. However, as far as I am concerned, challenging plan can bring us more opportunities and help us to achieve success. Firstly, people can be inspired by challenging plans. As the old saying goes that one?s potential is endless. Nothing is impossible if we try our best. For example, Steve jobs, one of the most successful persons in the world, quit from famous university and chose a more challenging career—to start an enterprise. Most people would think he must be crazy. Nevertheless, jobs has created the apple Empire because he knew that there would be a huge market for personal computer decades ago. If he continued his study which seemed to be more practical at that time, but he would hardly achieve such success. secondly, when facing challenging plans, people always work harder. I believe challenge and pressure can bring out the best in people. For example, my father was born in a small village. He learned farm work from my grandfather and wanted to be a farmer in the village just like my grandfather. After he went to Hangzhou, a big city near his village, he was attracted by the prospect of the city and so he decided to go to Hangzhou. He made up his mind to become a officer in that city. After five years hard working and struggle, he became a officer in Hangzhou finally. If he never went out of village, he would be just a farmer. Last but not least, practical plans will prevent people from making breakthrough. The nature of people is lazy. When people satisfy with their current lives, they will never want to give up the secure lives. Years after years, it becomes harder for them to challenge themselves because they have already accepted what they are. My sister gave up studying aboard after graduation and chose a secure job at hometown. Now she got married and had a baby. Her life is not quite well since the moderate salaries. However, she told me that she has accepted her life. Based on the above analysis, I should reiterate that in order to have greater success, people should try making a challenging plan rather than accept the practical plan right away. 机经第5篇 (2010 0410) Do you agree that people should have hobbies and do physical activities that are very different from one's work? Should people have hobbies and do physical activities that are very different from their own work? As far as I am concerned, people should take different kinds of activities because variety of activities make people stronger, have more friends and less easy to get bored. Firstly, people taking part in different kinds of activities are stronger than those who don?t. Different kinds of exercise and sports can help people train different parts of body. For example, basketball makes people agile while swimming makes people?s bodies stronger. Short distance runner need to do other kinds of sports like ping pong to train their arms since short distance running only make their legs stronger. For those brainworkers, they need to do physical activities to keep healthy and relax themselves from the huge pressure. Secondly, people make different kinds of friends when they take part in variety of activities. We can learn knowledge and information from friends. For instance, last year, I met David when I was playing the piano. He taught me a lot of music knowledge and corrected some mistakes of my gesture. What?s more, people who have a lot of friends feel happier than those who don?t. People have more parties to attend and it is easy for them to forget unhappy things. Besides, friends will do us a favor when we need help. Last but not least, people are easy to get bored if they keep doing the same job. When we are bored, our efficiency declines and we are easy to make mistakes. For example, last week, I was trying to work out a difficult math problem. After two days hard working, I still couldn?t find the answer and I became confused. Then I went out for a walk and didn?t think about the problem. I talked and played with children in a park. When I went back to my math problem, I work it out quickly. I found it was actually not as difficult as I thought. Based on the above analysis, I should reiterate that in order to be stronger and happier, people need to try different kinds of things. 机经第六篇(2009.11.7) For successful development of a country, should a government focus its budget more on very young children education rather than on universities Education is very important, because it pushes forward our society, the nation and the country. Yet, the government doesn?t have that much money for the education of the kids and college students. „People ask which should get more money from the government, the kids? education or the colleges; education? Indeed, there are arguments and opinions are divided. I personally believe that both are important and neither is less important Education contributes to the development of the society Almost all the countries, whether developed countries or developing ones, regard education as one of the most fundamental things,. However, given the limited budget, there must be a priority of government spending. Some believe that the education of young children deserves more input. Others argue that universities should receive a larger share of the state grant. Indeed, there are diverse voices and opinions. As far as I am concerned, I disagree with the idea given in the exam paper. I think both the primary schools and universities should receive the same amount of attention from the government. My reasons are as follows. Firstly, universities nurture talented people for the society. In universities, students continue to accumulate knowledge, train their abilities to deal with people and work, and shape their values systems until they are almost mentally and emotionally ready for the society. Such graduates will put their knowledge into practical use to create value for the society, and, little by little, improve their abilities to take over the responsibility of managing the society one day. In a word, the importance of university education can never be underestimated. If the government fails to invest in universities, then the nation as a whole will lose in the competition with other countries. Secondly, the importance of primary education is beyond doubt. In fact, any government that ignores primary education may pay a high price. As we all know, children are at the most vigorous and formative stage in their life , mentally, emotionally and physically . If the government can spend generously on primary education, then the kids will benefit directly, thus laying a solid foundations for the future. Traditional wisdom goes that a good-beginning makes a good ending. Also there is an old saying which goes that one?s childhood determines his adulthood. These may well explain why the government should pay no less attention to primary education than university education. Based on the above analysis, I should reiterate that negligence of either of primary education or university education will lead to disaster. Not enough budget is not the question, which can be squeezed out from other projects. Both primary education and university education need invest. 机经第七篇(2009.9.11): It is only worth watching movies that can teach us something about real life, agree or disagree, Ever since its birth, movie has been playing an increasingly important part in our recreational and leisure life. Some of the movies are deal with the real life; some with our fantasies about the future, some with funny and silly situations. Indeed the variety is amazing and the effects are awesome. However, there are people who believe that we should only watch movies that can teach us something about real life. As a result, such an extreme view is at the center of a storm of abuse. I, either, don?t agree with such a terrible view. My reasons are as follows. Firstly, different movies have different functions. Such a big variety greatly broadens people?s choice and improves their enjoyment. For example, amusement movies can cheer people up, so that people feel relaxed mentally and physically; fantasy movies lead people into a future world, thus greatly inspiring/igniting their imagination and creativity; and movies that deal with real life unfold the real world before people, as a result, people learn lessons and avoid mistakes in their real life. It is hard to imagine that there should be people who don?t like such a good choice. Secondly, if all the movies begin to reflect real life, then the audience will surely get bored. They live in life, which means that they have already known a lot about real life. No one will like to see something too similar to their real life in their valuable leisure time. People want to relax and recreate. They want something quite unlike their real life, so that they can, at least, forget about their helpless reality for a moment or they can have a chance to escape to a “much happier world”. For example, all girls love the movie Cinderella very much, because all girls have a dream that one day a prince will show up and take her as his wife. Of course, in real life, this is highly unlikely. But so what? Movies like Cinderella are very popular. Girls，especially the left-over ladies, don?t want to have their dreams extinguished by those movies that reflect reality. Thirdly, if people only watch movies that reflect the real life, then people will lose confidence. After all, such movies tell the same thing: life is hard and helpless. For example, some movies tell how expensive the houses are in big cities; some tell how scarce the medical resources are; some tell how difficult it is to get a job; and some tell how dark and unfair the society and the governments are. Such movies take away people?s hope for the future. As a result, if people watch such movies, they will become pessimistic. Based on the above analysis, I should repeat my view that I don?t agree with the opinion in the exam. Indeed, the audience welcomes variety and enjoyment. 第8篇 20100626NA Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? People who have learned many different skills are more likely to succeed than those who focus on learning only one skill. Nowadays, works are more complex in our world. If we want to solve those difficult works, we may have to use many different skills. Thus, there are some people who believe that learning many different skills are more likely to succeed than those who focus on learning only one skill. But others argue that focusing on learning one skill is enough because you don’t have so much time to learn so many different skills Indeed, there are diverse voices and opinions. As far as I am concerned, In order to be truly successful, a person needs to possess different types of skills rather than relying on only one skill. My reasons are as follows. Firstly, some people may believe that possessing one particular skill, especially if it is a highly professional one, can guarantee a stable, highly rewarding and therefore successful career. However, they don’t understand that these skills include many other basic skills. For example, computer engineer who deal with computer games have to learn math and they also good at painting. In these cases, people have to know many needed knowledge enough to support their profession. So that they can become an expert in their field and no one can challenge or replace him/her, which is largely considered to be a sign of great success. Secondly, most of the ordinary people in the world are not experts in any field. They are just common people in an ordinary profession. For them, to become successful does not rely on one skill, but a combination of different skills, and the more skills they have learned, the more likely they are to succeed. On the top of the essential skill list is numeracy skills. This involves the ability to work with figures, to calculate sums quickly, make fairly accurate estimates and to understand things like compound interest and basic statistics. Socializing skills are also important because a large social network not only creates ties to a body of people but also creates a network of relationships, which allows access to a large pool of resources and opportunities. Other skills such as decision making, critical thinking as well as public speaking are also important general skills that will help anyone to get ahead in practically any field. Based on the above analysis, I should reiterate that. We live in a diverse world and consequently it is necessary for a person to have a range of different skills in order to achieve success. 第9篇 20100619NA Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? If you need to discuss upsetting or controversial problems with others, Using e-mail/text messaging is better than using telephone/voice-messaging. When I need to talk about a problem that might be upsetting, I prefer to use e-mail or text messaging to express myself. I have three main reasons for this preference. First, I am an extremely sensitive person. I tend to see every tiny expression and nonverbal behavior as embodying special meaning. Even a glimpse of something can bother me for a long time. When I must communicate about something upsetting or controversial, I like to use e-mails or text messages so that I am not bothered by people?s reactions. If I cannot see how others are responding, I can remain focused on the problem and stay in the best condition to solve it. secondly, using written forms of communication such as e-mail and text messaging to discuss upsetting things allows people to pour out feelings that they are too embarrassed to state directly. At one time, I had problems with a friend in senior high school. He had helped me with mathematics since we were freshmen. This became a problem when his girlfriend entered my class. In order to avoid his girlfriend misunderstanding our relationship, he stopped talking to me and broke off our tutoring. I fell into deep sorrow. I was aware that it was necessary to have a deep conversation with him; otherwise, I would lose a friend. However, the words in my heart were hard to speak directly to him. I wrote a three-page letter and told him everything I thought. The letter saved our friendship. After that experience, I understood that writing can help resolve upsetting and controversial situations. t Finally, writing down ideas and opinions can be the best way to avoid conflict and misunderstanding. When people talk about upsetting and controversial issues, they are easily excited and then easily become involved in arguments. Solving problems by exchanging opinions and ideas through written words can prevent conflict from happening. One of my neighbors once dropped a note to me saying that my bicycle shouldn?t be parked in front the driveway. The note was contained in a very lovely envelope, which was so sweet that I could not say no to his request, although it is a shared driveway and I have the right to park my bike there. Based on the above analysis, that?s why I prefer to use e-mail or message to discuss upsetting problem. 第10篇 20100312NA Agree or disagree? If child want to do well in school, parents should limit the hours of watching TV programs or movies。 Nowadays, Children sit before the TV screen every day, lost in the world of TV programs or movies. As a result, their eyesight and their health are lost. Experts are worried and parents are concerned. They begin to question whether this machine is a curse or a blessing for the young. Indeed, arguments have appeared and opinions are divided. As far as I am concerned, I believe that if child want to do well in school their parent should limit the hours of watching TV programs or movies. My reasons are as follows. Firstly, if a kid sits before TV screen every day, then he is highly likely to ruin his eyesight or even worse, lose his health. A research completed by a professor in Zhejiang university shows that even in a primary school classroom 87.7% of the kids are nearsighted. This is a big trouble for the kid who has to wear thick glasses at a young age. It’s bad for children to do well in school because TV should be blamed. Secondly, staying with the TV for too long every day may poison the minds of the young and destroy their characters. Most of the online games that attract the kids are dirty, bloody and violent. If the kids see too many such scenes, then they will have greater potential to be a hooligan or a criminal in the future. It is beyond doubt that there is a connection between viewing violence and committing crimes. For example, my neighbor Jack, a boy of 7, is becoming rude and violent. After much observation, the worried parents have revealed the secret---the bloody Japanese cartoons. Now this little boy is not allowed to watch anything like that. Of course changes are taking place in him. Thirdly, if the kids sit before the TV screen every day, then they will get hooked. It is such an addiction that ruins the relationship between child and their classmates or school friends. Usually the young escape into a fantasy world after they return home. They become cold and less communicative. Thus, they may can’t deal wit Based on the above analysis, I should reiterate that. The parents should pay good attention to this and the government should clean up the TV programs. 机经第十一篇(2010.3.20): Family help or 政府帮助 Nowadays, the society is more peaceful and people are safer than ever before. Most of the people don?t need any help from any governmental organization. Thus appears a mistaken view that we don?t need the help of the government any longer. I don?t agree with people who hold such a terrible view. My reasons are as follows. Firstly, the government can offer us the protection of laws and keep us from dark forces. No one can avoid bad people and criminals in the society. When we are face with such terrible people, we are weak and soft, even with the help of the family members or friends. What we can do is to ask the government for help. The government has powerful laws and force organization to deal with such terrible forces. As a result, we can live in peace and safety. Secondly, the government can save us from huge disasters, like earthquake and wars. For example, in the most recent earthquake in china, no one can help himself when he is buried in the ruins. How can he offer any help to his family members. If without the help of the government, more people would have died in the natural disaster. Thirdly, the government can offer help to those who need help in a foreign country. for example, when I was traveling in South Africa, I lost everything, including my passport, visa, tickets and money. I was stuck in a foreign land without any help. I could not depend on my family members or friends, because they were far away and could not provide any timely help. What I could do was to go to the Chinese embassy. For another example, there are fights in an African country. There are thousands of Chinese work and live there. They are in great danger. Their family members can only pray and hope for a miracle. At this important moment, the government begins to take measures. It has send hundreds of planes and ships to that faraway country to bring back its citizens. So, it is obvious that the government plays a bigger role than anyone else. Based on the analysis above, I should say again that the view in the exam paper is wrong and misleading. 20090403NA Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? The best way to improve the quality of education is to increase teacher?s salaries. Whether the best way to enhance the education?s quality is to improve teachers? salaries? Most of people believe that improving the finance of teachers doesn?t contribute to increase quality of education because there are other ways to promote the educational quality. However, as far as I?m concerned, it is a much effective way to improve the quality of education through increase teachers? salaries. firstly, high payment could decrease their burden on the life of economic, and then it is also good for the teacher?s health, because high payment enable them to have less pressure from family, and it?s also unnecessary for them to find excess jobs to hold their family, such as home-teaching. Thus, they could have much more time on doing exercise. For example, they could use their free time on jogging. It is an excellent way for them to decrease the possibility of suffering to physical disorders, like obesity, hypertension and diabetes. So, teachers should have a good health condition to face their works, and then the quality of teaching would also increase a lot. Consequently, higher payment also contributes to teachers? physical fitness. Secondly, a good payment job can attract more outstanding people?s eye. They will want to be a teacher. Obviously, those bright people can improve the quality of education. What?s more, more people want to be a teacher which means that more people compete for the teaching job. Thus, teachers in order to maintain their position and even procure promotion in the near future, people must be overtime working and high concentration to achieve greater efforts. According to a recent survey that conducted by the Ministry of Education, there are 78.3 percent of teachers think that to make the higher salary is the most effective way to increase their quality on teaching. Therefore, to increase payment is an effective engine lead teachers to do better. Last but not least, there is no denying the fact that some other methods can improve teachers? teaching levels. For example, teachers could learn more skills in the courses to improve teaching quality, such as managing skills, leading skills and teaching skills. But it is also have some influence negatively, for example, when teachers took training class, they might don?t have enough time to work, and then their work experience would lose. Thus, I believe that increasing teachers? payment is a more effective and direct way to improve their teaching quality. Based on above analysis, I should reiterate that 综合作文 The speaker refutes the reading?s argument that 阅读大观点。 To overthrow the reading?s assumptions, The speaker offer some dramatically information. Firstly, speaker denies the statement in the reading material by pointing out 听力第一观点 in the speaker?s opinion 观点详细. Yet, the reading material only focuses on/insists 阅读一号观点. Secondly, the speaker casts doubt on the view in the reading material that 阅读二号观点. The reading material believes that 二号观点详细。By contrast, the speaker thinks this reasonable. From the opinion of speaker 听 力二号观点. Finally, the speaker believes that 听力三号观点及详细. Yet, reading material maintains that 阅读三号观点. Obviously, these two views contradict.